<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Skiller &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skiller.eu/tags/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skiller.eu</link>
	<description>Flash Platform, RIA, and the mobile world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:51:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A few useful links regarding the Apple/Adobe feud</title>
		<link>http://skiller.eu/2010/05/a-few-useful-links-regarding-the-appleadobe-feud/</link>
		<comments>http://skiller.eu/2010/05/a-few-useful-links-regarding-the-appleadobe-feud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 07:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantin Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Platform Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Platform News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe/Apple feud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skiller.eu/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last few weeks – in the wake of the release of Adobe&#8217;s Creative Suite 5, Apple&#8217;s iPad and Steve Job&#8217;s fittingly timed (and most importantly, partly factually incorrect) attacks on the Flash technology – I&#8217;ve read so many blog posts discussed with so many people in direct conversations, courses, and on conferences about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last few weeks – in the wake of the release of Adobe&#8217;s Creative Suite 5, Apple&#8217;s iPad and Steve Job&#8217;s fittingly timed (and most importantly, partly factually incorrect) attacks on the Flash technology – I&#8217;ve read so many blog posts discussed with so many people in direct conversations, courses, and on conferences about the matter that I&#8217;m actually getting pretty tired of it.</p>
<p>At first, I thought about putting my 2 cents here, but since almost all points I&#8217;d like to make have been uttered elsewhere already (with varying degrees of verbosity), I&#8217;ll simply post interesting links to those places instead. <span id="more-33"></span>Check back regularly – this page will be updated frequently.</p>
<p>February 2, 2010: Kevin Lynch – <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2010/02/open_access_to_content_and_app.html">Open Access to Content and Applications</a></p>
<p>February 17, 2010: Kara Swisher – <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100217/adobes-cto-kevin-lynch-talks-about-apple-insults-flashs-future-and-more/">Video Interview: Adobe CTO  Kevin Lynch Talks About Flash, Apple Insults, Flash&#8217;s Future and more</a></p>
<p>April 8, 2010: John Gruber – <a title="Daring Fireball entry by John Gruber" href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/iphone_agreement_bans_flash_compiler">New iPhone Developer Agreement Bans the Use of Adobe’s  Flash-to-iPhone Compiler</a></p>
<p>April 9, 2010: Joa Ebert – <a href="http://blog.joa-ebert.com/2010/04/09/what-apple-just-did/">What Apple just did</a></p>
<p>April 10, 2010: Game Haxe – <a href="http://gamehaxe.com/2010/04/10/bravo-apple/">Bravo Apple</a></p>
<p>April 10, 2010: Greg Slepak – <a href="http://www.taoeffect.com/blog/2010/04/steve-jobs-response-on-section-3-3-1/">Steve Jobs’ response on Section 3.3.1</a></p>
<p>April 11, 2010: Kara Swisher – <a title="Permanent Link: Exclusive Video: Adobe CTO Lynch  Smacks Back at Apple’s “Protectionist Strategy,” Calling It “Bad for  Consumers” (But He’ll Swing Chickens If Forced!)" rel="bookmark" href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20100411/exclusive-video-adobe-cto-lynch-smacks-back-at-apples-protectionist-strategy-calling-it-bad-for-consumers-but-hell-swing-chickens-if-forced/">Exclusive Video: Adobe  CTO Lynch Smacks Back at Apple’s “Protectionist Strategy,” Calling It  “Bad for Consumers” (But He’ll Swing Chickens If Forced!)</a></p>
<p>April 12, 2010: David Heinemeier Hansson – <a href="http://37signals.com/svn/posts/2273-five-rational-arguments-against-apples-331-policy">Five rational arguments against Apple&#8217;s 3.3.1 policy</a></p>
<p>April 19, 2010: Leo Bergman – <a href="http://blixtsystems.com/2010/04/apples-master-plan/">Apple&#8217;s Master Plan</a> (thanks to Greg Hamer for the hint)</p>
<p>April 29, 2010: Steve Jobs – <a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/">Thoughts on Flash</a></p>
<p>April 29, 2010: Leo Bergman – <a title="Permanent Link to Jobs lies in “thoughts on  Flash”" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.blixtsystems.com/2010/04/jobs-lies-in-thoughts-on-flash/">Jobs lies in “thoughts on Flash”</a> (thanks to Greg Hamer for the hint)</p>
<p>April 29, 2010: Kevin Lynch – <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2010/04/moving_forward.html">Moving Forward</a></p>
<p>May 4, 2010: Scott Gilbertson – <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2010/05/who-needs-flash/">Who needs Flash?</a></p>
<p>May 5, 2010: Michael Calore – <a title="Permanent Link to Adobe’s Kevin Lynch: Apple’s  Playing a Legal Game, Not a Technology Game" rel="bookmark" href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2010/05/adobes-kevin-lynch-apples-playing-a-legal-game-not-a-technology-game/">Adobe’s Kevin Lynch:  Apple’s Playing a Legal Game, Not a Technology Game</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skiller.eu/2010/05/a-few-useful-links-regarding-the-appleadobe-feud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple now has turned to the Dark Side of The Force</title>
		<link>http://skiller.eu/2010/04/apple-now-has-turned-to-the-dark-side-of-the-force/</link>
		<comments>http://skiller.eu/2010/04/apple-now-has-turned-to-the-dark-side-of-the-force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantin Ehrenstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Platform News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machiavellian attitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 3.3.1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skiller.eu/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Apple announced a significant tweak to their iPhone OS developer license agreement, Section 3.3.1. Changes are highlighted: 3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs. Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Apple announced a significant tweak to their iPhone OS developer license agreement, Section 3.3.1. Changes are highlighted:</p>
<blockquote><p>3.3.1 Applications may only use Documented APIs in the manner prescribed by Apple and must not use or call any private APIs. <strong>Applications must  be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript as executed  by the iPhone OS WebKit engine, and only code written in C, C++, and  Objective-C may compile and directly link against the Documented APIs  (e.g., Applications that link to Documented APIs through an intermediary  translation or compatibility layer or tool are prohibited).</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s pretty much a declaration of war against Adobe. They&#8217;re just days away from releasing an amazing Flash CS5 release featuring… *drumroll*… a packager for iPhone OS, targeted at iPhone, iPad, and iPad.<span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;Applications must be originally written in Objective-C, C, C++, or JavaScript&#8221; – who do they think they are? They want to tell the developer which tools to use? Apple&#8217;s trying to change the nature of the Web, and they&#8217;re swinging their weight to have things run their way.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically the same way how Microsoft achieved their current position, as <a title="John Gruber on section 3.3.1" href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/why_apple_changed_section_331" target="_blank">John Gruber put it</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>At a certain point developers wrote apps for Windows because so many  users were on Windows and users bought Windows PCs because all the  software was being written for Windows. That’s the sort of situation  that creates a license to print money.</p></blockquote>
<p>I still think the way Adobe managed to circumvent the obstacles for Flash Platform content on iPhone OS was brilliant. I&#8217;ve seen it as a way to show Apple the proverbial finger.</p>
<p>Yes, Adobe is a multi-billion company, too, but over the last few years, Adobe has consistently tried to alleviate development for the Flash Platform, opening up where they see fit (Flex SDK, BlazeDS, OSMF, TLF etc.). Of course there are some questionable products (e.g. LCDS).</p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s efforts to protect their <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">cash cow</span> AppStore makes Microsoft look pale in comparison. Apple&#8217;s about the create the most closed ecosystem you can think of. Of course, they have strong allies: with many of the major players like Google shifting more and more towards offering services for free, content providers may see the AppStore/iBookStore/iTunes ecosystem as some sort of last chance to cash in on their content.</p>
<p>I really believe in the free and democratic nature of the internet. Since the birth of the AppStore, Apple has shown some blatantly brazen attitude in deciding which apps to feature in the AppStore and which not. Until now, they got away with it because the developers wanted to go with the masses.</p>
<p>But now, the tone has changed. Apple has made it clear that they&#8217;ll try to squeeze every single possible penny out of their closed ecosystem before even thinking about enabling open innovation. Allow other forces to exert control over content on the iPhone/iPod/iPad? No way. Pay the 30% Apple tax and shut up. Want to develop for those devices? Pay $99 before you even think about it.</p>
<p>Just 18 months ago I switched from PC to Mac, partly because I still didn&#8217;t like the way Microsoft had played the game to make Windows the dominant OS on desktop computers. Now the way Apple tries to strong-arm their way into the mobile market makes me retch.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but think of the Dark Force and see that Applekin has turned to the Dark Side.</p>
<p>Obi Wan Adobe, I&#8217;m with you. Microsoft, you&#8217;ve improved a great deal over the last few years, pushing innovation. Maybe we could become friends after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skiller.eu/2010/04/apple-now-has-turned-to-the-dark-side-of-the-force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

